Skip to content

ci: fix protected branch error in release workflow#1120

Merged
matejchalk merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix-release-protected-branch
Sep 24, 2025
Merged

ci: fix protected branch error in release workflow#1120
matejchalk merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix-release-protected-branch

Conversation

@matejchalk
Copy link
Collaborator

@matejchalk matejchalk commented Sep 24, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Possible fix for #1114. Follow-up to #1117.

Turns out the default github-actions[bot] can't push to main (see CI error):

NX Pushing to git remote "origin"

NX Unexpected git push error: remote: error: GH006: Protected branch update failed for refs/heads/main.

remote:
remote: - Changes must be made through a pull request.
To https://github.com/code-pushup/cli
! [remote rejected] main -> main (protected branch hook declined)
! [remote rejected] v0.80.0 -> v0.80.0 (atomic transaction failed)
error: failed to push some refs to 'https://github.com/code-pushup/cli'

This is probably why the code-pushup-bot was used before, because unlike the built-in GitHub bot, we can configure exceptions for GitHub Apps.

image

The Git user configuration is taken from an example in create-github-app-token docs.

I've tested the authentication here. I can't really test the rest until this is merged into main 🤞

@github-actions github-actions bot added the 🦾 CI/CD Continuous integration and deployment label Sep 24, 2025
@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Sep 24, 2025 •
edited
Loading

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 37341a7

Command Status Duration Result
nx code-pushup --nx-bail -- compare ✅ Succeeded 54s View ↗
nx code-pushup --nx-bail -- ✅ Succeeded 1m 11s View ↗
nx code-pushup --nx-bail -- print-config --outp... ✅ Succeeded 1m 27s View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-09-24 12:15:34 UTC

@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Sep 24, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 37341a7

Command Status Duration Result
nx affected -t int-test --parallel=3 ✅ Succeeded <1s View ↗
nx affected -t e2e-test --parallel=1 ✅ Succeeded <1s View ↗
nx affected -t unit-test --parallel=3 ✅ Succeeded <1s View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-09-24 12:06:11 UTC

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Sep 24, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

@code-pushup/ci

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/ci@1120

@code-pushup/cli

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/cli@1120

@code-pushup/core

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/core@1120

@code-pushup/create-cli

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/create-cli@1120

@code-pushup/models

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/models@1120

@code-pushup/nx-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/nx-plugin@1120

@code-pushup/coverage-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/coverage-plugin@1120

@code-pushup/eslint-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/eslint-plugin@1120

@code-pushup/js-packages-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/js-packages-plugin@1120

@code-pushup/jsdocs-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/jsdocs-plugin@1120

@code-pushup/lighthouse-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/lighthouse-plugin@1120

@code-pushup/typescript-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/typescript-plugin@1120

@code-pushup/utils

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/utils@1120

@code-pushup/models-transformers

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/models-transformers@1120

commit: 37341a7

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 24, 2025

Code PushUp

🤨 Code PushUp report has both improvements and regressions – compared current commit 89d0227 with previous commit 53336e8.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Categories

🏷️ Category ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Performance 🔴 43 🔴 42 ↓ −0.5
Code coverage 🟡 90 🟡 90 ↑ +0.1
Security 🟡 56 🟡 56 –
Updates 🟡 85 🟡 85 –
Accessibility 🟢 92 🟢 92 –
Best Practices 🟢 100 🟢 100 –
SEO 🟡 61 🟡 61 –
Type Safety 🟢 100 🟢 100 –
Bug prevention 🟢 100 🟢 100 –
Miscellaneous 🟢 100 🟢 100 –
Code style 🟢 100 🟢 100 –
Documentation 🔴 24 🔴 24 –
👍 1 group improved, 👎 1 group regressed, 👍 3 audits improved, 👎 4 audits regressed, 12 audits changed without impacting score

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin 🗃️ Group ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Lighthouse Performance 🔴 43 🔴 42 ↓ −0.5
Code coverage Code coverage metrics 🟡 90 🟡 90 ↑ +0.1

19 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin 🛡️ Audit 📏 Previous value 📏 Current value 🔄 Value change
Lighthouse Total Blocking Time 🟥 1,010 ms 🟥 1,080 ms ↑ +7.1 %
Lighthouse First Contentful Paint 🟥 3.1 s 🟥 3.0 s ↓ −2.9 %
Lighthouse Speed Index 🟥 5.9 s 🟥 5.9 s ↓ −0.9 %
Lighthouse Time to Interactive 🟥 12.3 s 🟥 12.4 s ↑ +0.9 %
Code coverage Branch coverage 🟨 86.4 % 🟨 85.5 % ↓ −1.1 %
Code coverage Function coverage 🟩 91.9 % 🟩 92.5 % ↑ +0.7 %
Code coverage Line coverage 🟨 86.5 % 🟨 86.3 % ↓ −0.2 %
Lighthouse Avoids enormous network payloads 🟩 Total size was 2,037 KiB 🟩 Total size was 2,032 KiB ↓ −0.2 %
Lighthouse Minimizes main-thread work 🟥 8.7 s 🟥 9.3 s ↑ +7.1 %
Lighthouse Uses efficient cache policy on static assets 🟨 30 resources found 🟨 30 resources found ↑ +0.1 %
Lighthouse JavaScript execution time 🟥 3.1 s 🟥 3.4 s ↑ +7.6 %
Lighthouse Largest Contentful Paint 🟥 10.7 s 🟥 10.9 s ↑ +2 %
Lighthouse Reduce unused JavaScript 🟥 Potential savings of 156 KiB 🟥 Potential savings of 178 KiB ↑ +21.3 %
Lighthouse Reduce unused CSS 🟥 Potential savings of 102 KiB 🟥 Potential savings of 81 KiB ↓ −33.3 %
Lighthouse Metrics 🟩 100% 🟩 100% ↑ +0.9 %
Lighthouse Initial server response time was short 🟩 Root document took 420 ms 🟩 Root document took 520 ms ↑ +24.2 %
Lighthouse Server Backend Latencies 🟩 1,660 ms 🟩 1,740 ms ↑ +4.9 %
Lighthouse Max Potential First Input Delay 🟥 770 ms 🟥 820 ms ↑ +5.8 %
Lighthouse Network Round Trip Times 🟩 20 ms 🟩 20 ms ↓ −12.9 %

591 other audits are unchanged.

@matejchalk matejchalk merged commit 38b04e4 into main Sep 24, 2025
22 checks passed
@matejchalk matejchalk deleted the fix-release-protected-branch branch September 24, 2025 14:40
This was referenced Sep 25, 2025
Merged
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@hanna-skryl hanna-skryl hanna-skryl approved these changes

@vmasek vmasek Awaiting requested review from vmasek

@BioPhoton BioPhoton Awaiting requested review from BioPhoton

Assignees

@matejchalk matejchalk

Labels

🦾 CI/CD Continuous integration and deployment

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@matejchalk @hanna-skryl

Comments